Home Economics Stronger Risk Controls Do In Fact Reduce Risk At Big Banks

Stronger Risk Controls Do In Fact Reduce Risk At Big Banks

When you purchase through our sponsored links, we may earn a commission. By using this website you agree to our T&Cs.

A recent study finds that those annoying minimum capital and leverage ratio requirements do actually reduce the risk incurred by big banks. With the big banks getting bigger than ever, risk analysis and management will play a critical role in both the political and investment arenas.

Stronger Risk Controls Do In Fact Reduce Risk At Big Banks

“Stronger Risk Controls, Lower Risk: Evidence from U.S. Bank Holding Companies“:

We construct a risk management index (RMI) to measure the strength and independence of the risk management function at bank holding companies (BHCs). The U.S. BHCs with higher RMI before the onset of the financial crisis have lower tail risk, lower nonperforming loans, and better operating and stock return performance during the financial crisis years. Over the period 1995 to 2010, BHCs with a higher lagged RMI have lower tail risk and higher return on assets, all else equal. Overall, these results suggest that a strong and independent risk management function can curtail tail risk exposures at banks.

Via: floatingpath.com

Our Editorial Standards

At ValueWalk, we’re committed to providing accurate, research-backed information. Our editors go above and beyond to ensure our content is trustworthy and transparent.

Floating Path
Editor

Want Financial Guidance Sent Straight to You?

  • Pop your email in the box, and you'll receive bi-weekly emails from ValueWalk.
  • We never send spam — only the latest financial news and guides to help you take charge of your financial future.